Open Address
James Reynolds | December 22, 2007Zip.
I hereby request a reason for the second warn I received that night you slammed with with a total of 5 of them.
To clarify:
-
I put an insulting message to Zip in my sig (Morse Code)
-
He asks me to remove it. (Warning)
-
I agree to remove it.
-
I place non-offensive text in my signature.
-
He tells me to remove it. (Verbal Warning)
-
I ask which rule I had broken.
-
No response. (Warning & 3-Day suspension)
-
I proxy an account to check for badmouthing, since you can’t read the RP section unless you register.
-
No message. (“Indefinite” Ban) – (Thats 3 Warns to reach 6.)
I want you to explain #7 for me.
Right here, where I can contend with you and where everyone can see exactly why it is I think (/know) you’re out to get members of WSAG and are willing to treat them unfairly.
And as I commented, I’d appreciate it if you didn’t go and edit the rules this time so that it fits … I wasn’t too impressed last time.
Regards.
To clarify, we have NEVER allowed multi-accounting, especially after one has been warned or suspended. It just wasn’t put into the rules as we thought it was clear enough (common sense, really. You’re suspended, but can just create another account? Lol). It does strike me as odd, though, that you would choose to create a new account just to “check for badmouthing”, when you could have just as easily asked one of your friends to do so.
And theres a reason your ban was “Indefinite” and not “Permanent”. You just never bothered to contact us(Zip) to discuss the reasoning behind your banning, and instead decided to take everything to your blog, so I decided to leave it at that. Put it down to you not believing we would have done anything if you wish, but the fact is you never made the attempt.
How many of your friends are online at 4am? … Maybe 5am?
Not any of mine, and the badmouthing was going on as it happened.
And I’ve read the baffling little difference in your ban terminology, had it occured to you I don’t want to come groveling back to a website that banned me for no good reason?
I’m not disputing your multi-accounting rule, I do in fact heartily support it (or would have HAD it existed) I am questioning the warning that put me in the situation to start with.
Although it still puzzles me, I vaguely remember my signature/avatar dropping straight away (ie. Banned) before I even did the multi-accounting.
You have the records, that must be a trick of my memory.
So, #7. Lets hear it.
Although, how long ago did you write that stuff about “indefinite” not “permanent” bans?
Because that seems a fairly new imagining to me … I first saw it like two weeks ago.
Zip Army System 2: Edit Main settings Oct 20 2007, 06:02 AM
Zip Edited Member ‘JamesR’ account Oct 19 2007, 03:09 PM
Zip Edited Member ‘JamesR’ account Oct 19 2007, 03:08 PM
Zip Deleted Member(s) ( ProxieGuy ) Oct 19 2007, 03:08 PM
Zip Edited Group ‘Elite Member’ Oct 19 2007, 12:38 PM
Zip Forum ‘Gracelica Palace’ edited Oct 18 2007, 06:26 AM
Is what I have in the Admin Logs, which proves that you were indeed banned AFTER the deletion of the ProxieGuy account (thats my time zone btw). Ask Ice to check it if you wish.
Oh and the Suspension from the Warn logs;
JamesR None 3 Days None Oct 19 2007, 02:43 PM Zip
And thats as far as I can go in this.
As I said, merely a trick of my memory then, how about the addition to the rules?
Give me a guideline … Two weeks? Three?
Were they there when I was banned?
I put it up a week or so after you were banned at the same time I added in the Multi Accounting rule. Maybe the edits weren’t announced (the announcements system fails) until I edited the rules again a couple of weeks ago, though. If so, thats my mistake.
Hmm … Fair enough.
Its probably that I had no reason to check the rules after my initial postings untill you guys let Resuri get flamed and added that rubbish about PMs being out of your jurisdiction.
*Continues to wait*
PMs are out of juristiction. we dont monitor them enough to enforce them
This is going to be rather lengthy, but you asked, so….
Before any of this even started, you were already at a 10% warn. Left there by Blitz for all the SSBB thread nonsense. I cannot give you the justification for that warn, as it was Blitz’s, but I agreed with it’s being there wholeheartedly.
The initiation of the events that led to your ban was probably when this message showed up in your signature:
“ZIP EST AN ASS FORAMEN”
In Morse code. Now, I don’t know if you thought people would write it off as meaningless dots and dashes, or if they’d ignore it because hey, it’s not in simple Arabic characters. Either way, it was a direct insult at a member of the forums. It wouldn’t have mattered who you had aimed it at; I was online at the time, I saw it, and I gave you the appropriate warning for straight up insulting a member in your sig. Then I sent you a PM, asking you kindly to remove it:
-
“Please remove the blatantly inappropriate and insulting line of Morse code from your signature. Failure to do so will result in another warn which you can read more about here [link to forum rules].
Regards, the ET Staff.”
-
Rule justifying Warn:
“- Flaming: This could include Racism, Trolling, aggression towards authorities etc.”
JamesR’s Warn level at this point: 20%
I could have insulted you back, I could have taken it personally and acted much harsher than I did. Instead, I ignored the bait and did what I would have done had it been any other member you called an “ASS FORAMEN”. The Morse is removed. It is replaced immediately by another line of text that is clearly not Morse, and may not even be code, but the word “ZIP” is the only translatable part in it. I cannot decipher it. A response is sent to me:
-
“Warning for what precisely?
Theres no rule against having codes in signatures.”
-
You detailed that PM as action number 3: “I agreed to remove it.” Not exactly what I got out of the message, but… alas, you are correct. There is no such rule, so he gets no warning for it. But I have, and will inform you of, my reasons for asking you to remove it in my response:
-
“It was narrowed down to three possibilities:
1.) Not a code at all, simply for baiting purposes.
2.) A code, but a message that doesn’t break any rules, also for baiting purposes.
3.) An extremely obscure code that is even more insulting than the last.
Whichever, it would be greatly appreciated if you removed it. Thank you. A response to this message would indicate that you have read and understand the warning, and also that if the message hasn’t been removed yet, it is simply being ignored.”
-
The code in your signature once again undergoes a change, but it is still there, and still contains “ZIP” in all caps, not that it would even matter at this point. I receive yet another PM:
-
“On the contrary, you haven’t explained how I have broken any rules.
So regardless of how much you would appreciate it, its staying until you can clarify that.
Regards,
Concerned Member of ET.”
-
The code has not been removed at the time this PM was sent. In fact you never removed it at all. I did. So you chose to ignore my final verbal warning, an actual warn was applied.
Rule justifying Warn:
- Failure to rectify signature/profile/other errors”
JamesR’s Warn level at this point: 30%
Rule justifying Suspension:
“Suspensions will be given when your warning percentage reaches certain levels, no matter how much time has passed between warns:
a. 3 – 3 days”
You had hit the 30% mark, so I gave you the three day suspension as detailed in the rules topic, which I even linked you to. I don’t know where all your claims for being warned by me up to seven times (the number varies each time you tell the story), but it was in all actuality only two.
Now here’s where you made your mistake: you multi-accounted. I’m not sure if this is the rule Blitz had to add simply because of your ranting about an unjust ban, but it should have been kind of obvious what the result of sidestepping a suspension would be.
Rule justifying Ban:
“If you are suspended, you are suspended. Creating a new account for whatever reason will just result in a longer suspension/an indefinite ban.”
But you proxied it? How did we know it was you!? Well, to be honest, I didn’t even have to check the IP address. A new member, with the name ProxieGuy, shows up within five minutes of you getting suspended? Not to mention he has already made a signature so fast after joining: “I laugh still harder at your feeble attempts.” Large italic pink text, if I remember correctly, and an extremely similar line to the one that was in JamesR’s sig before I deleted it upon suspending him…. It wasn’t exactly hard to figure out. So I banned your main account immediately and deleted ProxieGuy. If your blog was anything to go by, you didn’t even notice until after the suspension would have gone away.
When Blitz signed on a few hours later he asked what happened, I told him, and he agreed that what I had done was justified. And so concludes the story of the day JamesR was banned. “The truth behind 10/19/07,” if you will.
Despite all your claims, I don’t hate you, and I never have. I am not “out to get you,” nor am I out to get all your friends. Madmarkus had the same code in his signature as you did after the first verbal warning. He removed it after the first actual warn, without shouting for justification. In the Kalas vs. Resuri affair I sent both of them PMs. Resuri’s, I kindly informed her that she could block members from sending her PMs, since it is a little known feature and she might want to utilize it, considering the harmful nature of the PMs she was receiving. Kalas’s message was a lot harsher, I pretty much told him to cut the bullshit and block the members he didn’t like, if their PMing was going to cause him further angst. You couldn’t see the messages we sent Kalas, and so presumed we were letting him continue his actions unabated. I did not even get involved in that particular escapade until BlacKalas appeared, and they started flaming on your blog.
As for my claim that PMs are out of our jurisdiction, they really are, and I would like to keep it that way. This does not mean they are not punishable. If a member is being harassed by another member via PMs, they can PM an Admin the details and request the appropriate action be taken. This was not done in the case we are referring to. In the case we were referring to, both members in question chose not to contact an Admin, choosing instead to flame each other repeatedly without getting the authorities involved. In that instance, the best thing that can be done is simply block the member in question, as both parties have kind of taken it beyond it being one member’s fault and therefore one member’s punishment. As fun as it would be for Blitz and I to trawl through the PM SQL logs for any insulting messages, it really wouldn’t, and we’d like to continue respecting our member’s privacy. Unless the PM is reported, there’s nothing we can or will do about it until it starts spilling over into the open.
I would never have posted here at all if the “Ban the Jewfro” banners had not started showing up on the forums, but your current post confirms some of my suspicions that you still hold a grudge about being banned, despite all your claims of putting it behind you. I was merely waiting for you to flat out request my reasoning behind it, so here it is. I hope you found it satisfactory.
Do I have a sense of humor? Why yes, I do have one, and I pride myself on it. I was actually very amused by BlacKalas and your Christmas Message from God (written in what looks like tape on the floor of a Wal-Mart, His Feet even visible on the edges), if maybe not in the way you had intended. At the same time, I was well aware of how insulting it must have been towards Kalas himself. But I did see the humor in it.
The “Jewfro”? Yes, I can see the intended humor behind that, but in all actuality it just isn’t funny. Especially when you put Hitler’s face on it. I ask myself: “Are banners depicting Hitler, with a message saying ‘Ban the Jewfro,’ ‘Shave one today,’ and the like really appropriate to have on ET?” No, they really aren’t. The message as a whole is pretty hateful, not funny at all. When someone sees a picture of Hitler, next to an anti-Semitic message (despite how parodical your intentions, it comes across anti-Semitic), they think of the Holocaust. The Holocaust wasn’t funny. Maybe it was to you… but…. No. Not on ET, sorry. Even if I was the most humorous person on the face of the planet, the Holocaust would not be funny.
I had no problem, however, with just the hair. Madmarkus had no banner with a hateful message, no picture of Hitler, just Kalas’ hair spliced onto a variant of his usual avatar. Until he flat out asked to be warned (putting him at 30% and a suspension), there was really no reason for one. His general anti-everything-ET attitude up until that point made Blitz more than happy to oblige.
I however wasn’t involved in any of the warnings or suspensions in this case, deciding instead to leave it all to Blitz. I endorse every action he took on the matter though. I might have given Dachande only three chances to remove the banner instead of four, but other than that I believe he did the right thing. Let’s not forget that that is what started all this rubbish in the first place.
Now that I’ve given you what you wanted, and made clear a few other points, I think I’m done with NRT. I’ll probably continue to check it, but I’ll likely go back to not commenting, unless called on to do so for a legitimate reason, like in this instance. I do actually enjoy reading what you have to say about Elemental Temple, and if you keep it up you are going to become quite the authority on all things ET. You dedicate more of your time to our site then some of our own current staffers. Anyway, hearing things from someone else’s perspective is a very healthy way to keep up a flexible outlook. I would ask all the other members of ET do the same in putting the past behind them, and respect James’ personal space by not flaming on his blog any longer.
(Also I apologize if there are any typographical or grammatical errors in this. It’s rather long, and while I scanned over it several times, I am but a man. Seriously though, I’m done, and I’m not even going to check for responses. There are other ways to contact me if you want a retort to be heard.)
My God most of that was completely pointless, The story starts presuming a 10% Warn, I asked you exactly what rule I had broken and you still have not answered that.
I asked you what I had done wrong to warrant a verbal warning and despite that essay you still haven’t told me it.
So please, do so.
Edit: Since you can’t make sense of the Timeline yourself, #1 Is the Morse Code message.
You see, from my stand point, you can’t hand out Verbal Warnings because you’re paranoid.
The jumble of random letters was just that, I would have told you that had you asked.
So I inquire again, what exactly was your verbal warning for? There was no “Error” in my signature nor was there anything offensive.
I did answer all of your questions in that. I understand it was a huge block of text, and your gut instinct is to scroll to the bottom and pop in a witty comment about how long it was without even finishing it. However, I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt, and just do a simple rephrasing, in the same easy step-by-step sequence you yourself provided. And what was with the edit about me not making sense of the timeline? I saw your list, and if I remember I only made one reference to it in my “essay.”
-
1.
You put a message in your signature insulting a member (calling them an ASS FORAMEN)
2.
I warn you for the insult, and send you a verbal warning to remove it or face another warning.
3.
You ask what you were warned for, as there is no rule against having code in signatures. (“I agree to remove it.” Funniest form of “agreeing” that I’ve ever seen.)
4.
You replace the insulting message with a jumble of characters in your text with the word “ZIP” in all caps. It might be a code, it might not. Either way I’ve had enough.
5.
I give you a SECOND verbal warning, since you did in fact go along with the first (removed all MORSE code from your signature). I tell you the reasons why you will get a warning if you don’t comply, and I specify exactly when and how you will earn that warning (responding before removing it).
6.
You tell me you aren’t going to do anything until I tell you what rule you’ve broken (essentially exactly what my last PM was). You have responded to the PM without removing the line of text, indeed, it has merely been changed again.
7.
There is no reason to give a third verbal warning, two is enough. Your warn level increases to 30% and the suspension is applied. There are no warnings or informative PMs between hitting 30% and being suspended. There was a link to the Rules in the first PM and it was presumed that you had read them and understood what was coming.
8.
You multi-account. This is a very demeaning analogy, and I mean no offense by it, but imagine a child at day-care has been put in time-out. He immediately stands up and runs to play with his friends again. Well that kid is just going to get in more trouble, isn’t he? Yeah. It’s common sense really, which is why we didn’t even need it detailed in the rules. That’s another thing you don’t seem to understand. As an Administrator, I could’ve banned you the second I realized what your trolling was doing to the boards, and you wouldn’t have been able to do a thing about it. Had I been the one to ban you, not even Sat could have brought you back, no matter the amount of whining. But I didn’t. I asked you to stop, instead. And I wasn’t the only one. I still have no idea why Sat made you a Moderator, but you had done nothing to deserve it in the rest of the staff’s eyes. From my perspective you had done nothing to merit being un-banned in the first place except rally your friends to complain for you. But I was not involved in that particular angst-fest until the very end when I saw that you had somehow become a Moderator, and you know the rest from there, as well as my standpoint on that particular action.
9.
I ban you for multi-accounting. There are no warns involved here. Who would I send a message to anyway? ProxieGuy? No, there’s no reason to. You shouldn’t really have any questions about why multi-accounting got you banned anymore. It’s been answered enough.
-
Paranoid? I sent you the possibilities I had narrowed it down to, and it appears I was right.
1.) Not a code at all, simply for baiting purposes.
2.) A code, but a message that doesn’t break any rules, also for baiting purposes.
3.) An extremely obscure code that is even more insulting than the last.
So it was number one then. Bait.
“I put a jumble of harmless letters in my signature. There’s no rule against that! Let’s see if he warns me for it so that I can complain about the Administrators not even enforcing their own rules correctly and cause even more dissent than I already have, or just start an argument with Zip, who I hate because he won’t let me a Moderator.”
Am I close?
I gave you the possibilities when you asked for my reasoning, you could have told me it was number one in your response, but it wouldn’t have mattered. I honestly didn’t even care what it meant, if it was a code. If you hadn’t removed it by the time you responded I would have warned you, putting you at 30% and that would have been that. I was sick of your antics at that point, and if you were willing to bait me, I was willing to take it. Paranoia had nothing to do with it. I already said that the fact it was me you were insulting had nothing to do with the outcome.
So unless you point out an ACTUAL FLAW in my story, or some LEGITIMATE reason why you didn’t deserve the punishment you got, I’m not responding. Look at Madmarkus. As I already said, he removed the “jumble of random letters” after the first warning. Maybe you should ask him why he did that, since he wasn’t breaking any rules, and there was no “Error”, nor anything offensive in his signature.
Your only attack in my story at this point seems to be “What was your verbal warning for?” Well, I already gave you the justifications for all the actual warns and actions, might as well go in a little deeper and make it even simpler for you.
Justification for FIRST VERBAL WARNING:
A warn had been administered for insulting, a verbal warning accompanied it asking to have the insult removed.
The only reason I did not remove it was that members (You and Mad) had recently complained about Admins editing inappropriate signatures without sending a message to the user in question. It was a reasonable request so I went along with it and sent the verbal warning instead of just skipping the drama and getting the job done myself.
Justification for SECOND VERBAL WARNING:
Flat out baiting and taunting an administrator when the consequences had already been made clear in the first verbal warning. I believe that sentence is what you were asking for so I’ll say it again, so you can’t miss it:
Flat out baiting and taunting an administrator when the consequences had already been made clear in the first verbal warning.
There. If that doesn’t satisfy you I honestly have no idea what will, and don’t really care. You can’t honestly expect you’d manage to argue your way back to ET after all the shit you’ve said about us and insults you’ve thrown after getting banned. And if that isn’t your motive, which is a possibility considering you DID say you no longer cared about ET, then WHY do you want all the obvious reasoning behind your punishment spelled out for you? Just after a good debate? I understand it must be hard to piss off an assload of teenagers, an apparent hobby of yours, when all you have to work with is blog comment boxes, but give yourself a gold star because you’ve gotten as far as you’re going to with the ET staff.
There is one thing I’m still curious about though. How did you arrive at the word “foramen”? Thesaurus? I know it’s basic meaning is “hole,” but anatomically, the one you were referring to is a sphincter. I’m not even joking, it’s really been irking me and I just have to know.
So, good-bye JamesR! We may meet again someday, but quite frankly, I doubt it.
Happy Holidays! Two more days ’til Christmas!
Well you’re either point-blank lying, or you are just mistaken, because your #3 is not the correct series of events.
I immediately removed the insulting text because I new i’d been rumbled … My asking you what rule I had broken was in response to my #4 … not the #1 like you think.
That is a fabrication.
And there, again, you haven’t provided an actual reasoning … Unless “I’ve had enough” is your justification.
Here is the message you refer to as your original explanation for the warning:
““It was narrowed down to three possibilities:
1.) Not a code at all, simply for baiting purposes.
2.) A code, but a message that doesn’t break any rules, also for baiting purposes.
3.) An extremely obscure code that is even more insulting than the last.
Whichever, it would be greatly appreciated if you removed it. Thank you. A response to this message would indicate that you have read and understand the warning, and also that if the message hasn’t been removed yet, it is simply being ignored.””
—
Well #1 isn’t against the rules regardless, but it wasn’t that. #2 isn’t against the rules and it wasn’t that anyway and #3 IS against the rules but it wasn’t that.
And do you even appreciate how pompus your presumption is? My query obviously proves it incorrect.
So for the third time now, what rule did I break to earn a second verbal warning?
And try to stick to the actual series of events this time.
—
I’ll admit I could stop reading there, but i’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and read on …
… I don’t really care about being a moderator, but some recognition for my contributions was appreaciated and I made sure Saturous knew that. Unlike some people, I never abused the powers I was given.
Again, thank you for proving you don’t really have a reason besides “I’d had enough”, because last I checked … Having a short fuse isn’t really just cause.
If I was baiting, it isn’t against the rules. We’ve been through this, i’ve been subjected to it before and it was fine then.
Oh and where in the verbal warning does it clarify that baiting is supposedly against the rules?
““Please remove the blatantly inappropriate and insulting line of Morse code from your signature. Failure to do so will result in another warn which you can read more about here [link to forum rules].”
I don’t see it there … This is your second definitive misleading claim in that comment.
Errrm … You Don’t know what i’m after? Well … Thats kinda the point. After all, I am all but proving you didn’t have a good reason for the second warn. That is all I set out to prove, simply re-read the opening post to clarify.
… Heh, “only blog comment boxes to work with” … Quite. They seem to have worked miracles so far. Its not so much as a hobby as something I do to occassionally pass the time.
Oh and Foramen … Well … If you can’t even work that out i’m amazed you managed to spot the morse code. We’ll leave the blindingly obvious answer for someone else to pick up on.
So if you aren’t going to return … There you go Blitz.
He has no real justification – as I already said – for the Warn he gave me.
After all, regardless of what was in my Sig (which was non-offensive jibberish) he refused to tell me exactly what was against the rules about it.
In fact, just asking about it caused me to get the warn as he has clearly stated here.
I consider this a sound win. As is the norm.
Consider it a ‘win’ if you want (Its all a game, yeah. Banning JamesR, it’s going to be a massive hit!), his actions were clearly justified in my opinion, and thats all that matters to me, tbh. Enjoy your ‘victory’.
So go on then, exactly how is it justified?
He gave me that second warn for asking what I had done to warrant a verbal.
Thats fair?
He gave me a verbal for having a signature.
Thats fair?
You guys consistently prove me right and Zip has admitted himself that he ignored your open door policy.
You don’t follow your own rules … Your own system … Your own policies.
I guess my mistake was expecting you to.
Quite
Thank you … Twit.
Good guess, but no it was me lol.
Ah yes, it’s hard to tell one annonymous comment IP from another, had I looked I would’ve noticed it was from MD.
Anyway, it puzzles me that you speak for the Admins?
“PMs are out of juristiction. we dont monitor them enough to enforce them”
We Don’t? … You don’t do anything …
I was commenting on how Blitz expectations of how you would follow the things you yourself say was a silly notion. But no I don’t mod the pm’s since I am not a mod, however it would make sense that you can’t be punished for something said over via pm would it not? It is after all a personal message, you are not openly flaming anyone, and the only other people who can see it other then the reciever are the gm’s. So why should there be reprimandments if something, essentially in this case hateful does not want to be recieved can be blocked.
*Gets out decoder*
If someone wrote you an abusive letter … You could take them to court.
If someone used an e-mail server to send you hatemail, you could appeal to the provider to revoke their access.
It’s their system and thus their responsibility.
At least you’ve admitted they were hateful messages.
I never said they weren’t James. In fact in that apology I typed out towards you and Resuri which you so politefully and immediatly casted away saying I had done to much “shit” to be forgiven now I said that I did not mean to include her within that insult on youtube and should have apologized atleast to her from the start. The pm she sent me mixed with my frustration towards you to begin with prevented me from that, and thus I made the shameful mistake of flaming instead.
I’m not going to speak for her, and it’s hardly proper to address her through my Blog … Shes never so much as posted a comment here >_>
If you want to say anything to her … You should really go and say it to her, not me.
I, have no real interest in hearing any.
Well seeing as she was your gf, I figured she either 1. read your blog or 2. you would have shown her, stating something in the ways of “heh, look now hes trying to beg for forgivness”. Regardless I figured she would see it, but if it makes you feel better I’ll send her a PM unless she blocked me.
That would be poetic justice really wouldn’t it …
… And you speak like I keep the girl on a leash. I doubt she reads this, that would make absolutely no sense really.
I didn’t mean to imply anything like that. I only thought that with your tremendous effort in gaining an apology from me, you would be showing her, or atleast telling her about it. Either way, I just PMed her, so whenever she gets on, she can see that I do realize I was out of line, and that I apologise for jumping on her (so to speak) like that.
I didn’t really put any effort into getting an apology, all I really want is justice.
Which, notably, I never got.
Its funny really, I just approved that comment and then “Go fuck your whore of a horse girlfriend” just leapt of the screen at me.
Ya that part was a bit out of hand, I had decided not to post here again so I took all my pent up anger at you two and just kind of vented it into one huge flametastic comment. My bad? =P, deep regrets for that. But meh, maybe one day we will get past it, who knows right?
Oh, I have a fair idea. Its all a barrel of laughs right? Your bad … Yeah, understatement.
It may be an understatement but I don’t owe you that much of an apology seeing as you spent the last week dedicating your life to being a complete ass. I may have over reacted, but you blew it out of proportion. Once someone apologises there isn’t much else that can be said afterwards, so yes my bad. And why is it that everytime I apologise to you, I find myself wishing I hadn’t because no matter what I say or how sincere I am, your still a complete dick to me. Meh, thats life <<.
And how many times do I have to tell you that I don’t want your apology.
I’m still a dick, Elle’s still a girl and you’re the french-american douchebag who called my girlfriend a whore.
The world still turns.
I guess so, but as I said before, I’m not extending the apology to you, just to Leslie. The day you stop being a dick is the day you die, and even then you will probably still be a little fagit. So kudos to you for being the biggest pussy whipped pansy I ever met ^^.
And yet you continue to extend it somewhere i’ve told you she doesn’t check …
… Do you realise how hillarious you look when you can’t even spell Faggot?
Fagit … lol.
Also, I scoff at your claim of being whipped.
Anyway, this is the Kalas we know … Throwing his rather enormous weight around.
Oh yes, my enormous weight which entails 138 pounds. At any rate, since you don’t actually read my comments fully, I’ll repeat myself. I PMed her, now if your saying she doesn’t check ET anymore then there is no other way for me to reach her. Further more I do in fact know how to spell faggot, I shortened it into fagit so ya you lose.
It’s funny, as I read Kalas’ comment there I actually thought he was talking about himself.
Haha that is almost so funny that I forgot to laugh, but no worries I did remember to…at your stupidity. Before you even try to insult someone, you should really go shave and maybe bathe a few times, you look like a smelly hobo >>.
138 Pounds? You must be really very short then … and I am perfectly capable of reading your comments.
Are you mine?
You are still petitioning about your apologies here … When i’ve made it clear that nobody who reads this cares.
I find it amusing you expect us to believe you shorted one word in your whole comment … and not even the longest one … by just a single letter. For my convieniance.
Heh, don’t go on that tour with that stuff …
Um if you say so…thats how I always type fagit…I didn’t shorten it for your convenience. How am I “that short” I’m 5 foot 8. Thats average height for my age…and 138 pounds is average weight, maybe a little under actually. Anyway your definatly not one to talk seeing as though you look like your 14 and appear to twease your eyebrows >>.
If thats how you always type it … Then you always type it wrong.
I’m fairly sure it surprises nobody.
I have naturally soft features and a well defined brow. These are good things.
Unlike the chubby cheeked, jewfro wearing, KFC eating surrender monkey
Looking like a Hobo is awesome. Combined with my reputation for severely hurting short little twats who mouth off at me, it means I get given a wide berth. I understand you get given a wide berth by necessity.
I don’t get the bathing thing though, the webcam makes my skin look rather darker than it really is, guess. Still, I’d choose to look middle eastern over looking like some sort of short cowardly fat frenchman…
Hey, I can hurl insults too!
Um, I actually don’t eat KFC, my cheeks really aren’t that chubby, plus that was an oldish pic case you didn’t pick that up, and I don’t have a jewfro either, its pretty long now and I look somewhat like a skater which I don’t really care for but meh. And naturally soft features…takes of 6 or so years…if you say so. For christmas I’ll send you some new tweasors xD.
Oh Kalas, not everyone needs tweezers to masturbate with.
Skater! You just have to meet some of my friends …
Believe what you want …
Do you always intentionally mispell tweezers to?